
powered by


GIS: a tool for conservation
GIS stands for "Geographic Information
System." In lay terms, a GIS is a set of computerized tools for working with
information that is related to a specific location on the earths surface. Because
these "spatial data" are different than regular data, a typical GIS includes a
wide variety of special functions that arent found in other database programs.
Probably the most significant of these involve uncovering relationships between different
sets of spatially distributed information. For example, GIS can be used to analyse the
relationship between crop productivity patterns and moisture and nutrient patterns. Since
GIS deals with mapped data, a common product of GIS consists of digital and/or paper maps.
Some examples are given in the Applications Showcase below.
GIS Implementation at BSC
Bird Studies Canada is pleased to employ the
industry standard for GIS ARC/INFO as its main GIS solution, as well as
ArcView GIS for desktop mapping and analysis. In January, 1997, Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) provided
BSC with a complimentary copy of ARC/INFO and ArcView GIS as part of the ESRI Conservation
Program (ECP). The ECP is aimed at non-profit organizations that wish to implement a GIS,
but dont have the financial resources to make the initial investment of software.
Our work would not be possible without the generous contribution of ESRI. To learn more
about the ECP and to obtain application forms, the ECP web site can be consulted. A related web
site, sponsored by the Society for Conservation GIS
provides information, tools, conferences, and other support to non-profit organizations
involved in GIS.
Since 1997, BSCs experience with GIS has
grown substantially: GIS now permeates almost every Bird Studies Canada project in one
aspect or another. Below are some of our success stories and future plans.
Applications Showcase
Conservation Priorities for the Birds of
Southern Ontario
This project utilizes a combination of bird
distribution data broad scale range maps at the national level and finer scale
range information from the Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas (OBBA) to identify the
degree to which a jurisdiction (such as a province, ecoregion, or municipality) possesses
"responsibility" for a particular bird species. The concept of
"jurisdictional responsibility" or JR, is based on the premise that a
species range may be concentrated to a greater degree in certain jurisdictions than
others. Using range maps such as those in Figure 1, GIS is used to calculate the
proportion of a species range falling within jurisdictional boundaries. A JR score
is then calculated based on this value (the higher the proportion of range captured within
the jurisdiction and with the effect of the size of jurisdiction removed the
higher the JR score).
Figure 1. Broad scale range maps (top) and
transformed Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas distributions (bottom) for two species. Based on
breeding distributions at the continental scale (shown in yellow), the Canadian
responsibility for Acadian Flycatcher is low (i.e., its breeding range barely extends into
extreme southern Canada), whereas responsibility for Philadelphia Vireo is very high
(i.e., almost all of its continental breeding range is found in Canada). If we look at the
Ontario distribution of these two species (bottom), we find that responsibility is high
for Acadian Flycatcher in the south (because its Ontario breeding range is concentrated
entirely in southern Ontario) whereas responsibility is high for Philadelphia Vireo in the
north.
For municipalities, watersheds and other local
scale units, priority bird species are identified based on a composite JR score (an
average of JR scores from different geographic scales), an "area sensitivity"
score and a "preservation responsibility" score. Once a list of priority species
has been finalized for a jurisdiction, a map showing the overlap, or degree of species
richness, can be created to illustrate "hot spots" of conservation concern
(Figure 2). For full details on scoring methods and a complete description of the project,
please visit the main Conservation
Priorities web page where a report can be downloaded..

Figure 2. Forest bird species
richness in the Grand River basin. The areas with the darkest shading on the map indicate
a high degree of overlap of high priority forest bird species. The map can be used to
examine configurations of protected areas and to broadly evaluate development plans.
South Walsingham Forest Management
Project
The aim of this project was to provide
forest management recommendations to public and private landowners within the South
Walsingham Sand Ridges/Big Creek Floodplain Forest, a provincially-designated ANSI (Area
of Natural and Scientific Interest). Through field surveys of birds and vegetation, the
technical team designed a five year plan that balances both wood production and
biodiversity conservation within the forest. GIS modelling was used intensively in
designing the management strategy. By using data gathered at transect points throughout
the forest, we were able to define "breeding activity zones" for a variety of
species inhabiting the forest (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Actual distribution
of American Redstarts within the South Walsingham Forest study area as determined by point
counts (coloured dots). Modelled distribution (probability of presence) shown in shading,
with darker shades indicating a higher probability value (pale yellow line indicates 0.8
cutoff level used in the study).
Similar maps were produced for tree
density/maturity, with the intention of comparing bird patterns to forest density
patterns. Riparian zones, steeply sloped areas and additional sensitive features were
incorporated into the GIS model and a framework was built to guide forestry operations for
the next five years. A full report will be available soon on our web site.
Forest Fragmentation and Birds
It is now widely accepted that the spatial
extent and configuration of forest habitat in a given area has an influence on populations
of forest-breeding birds. The amount of "forest interior" habitat (defined here
as the part of a forest patch that remains after a 100 m buffer from the forest edge has
been removed), which is generally higher in regions with greater amounts of forest cover
and reduced fragmentation, may be particularly important. For example, we would expect the
suite of species occupying a landscape with smaller, more isolated patches of forest
(Figure 4) to be quite different than the suite of species occupying a landscape
consisting of larger, less fragmented blocks (Figure 5). The role of the regional
landscape (forest patterns in a broader region surrounding the landscape of interest) may
also be important. Using satellite-derived land cover information (Landsat TM data
generously provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) and bird distribution
information (presence/absence data within 10 x 10 km UTM squares from the OBBA,1981-1985),
we are investigating these questions.

Figure 4. A landscape with a low to
moderate degree of forest cover and moderate fragmentation, located near Guelph. This
landscape is approximately 13% (1287 ha) forested, with 11% (142 ha) of its forests
considered "forest interior" habitat. During the OBBA, a total of 77 different
species of birds were identified as probable or confirmed breeders in this UTM square,
with an additional 7 species classified as possible breeders.

Figure 5. A landscape with a
high degree of forest cover and low fragmentation, located near Long Point. This landscape
is approximately 38% (3812 ha) forested, with 45% (1712 ha) of its forests considered
"forest interior" habitat. During the OBBA, a total of 107 different species of
birds were identified as probable or confirmed breeders in this UTM square, with an
additional 23 classified as possible breeders.
Future
Plans
We are currently working on a wide variety of
projects concerning GIS and conservation. We are part of a team of experts designing and
evaluating potential sampling schemes for the next Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas, scheduled
to commence in the spring of 2001. Check the Birds
Ontario web site for updates. We are compiling a polygon layer for Important Bird
Areas across the nation. Once complete, the IBA polygons will be used for interactive data
display and entry over the web. Finally, we are collaborating with partners from
Partners-in-Flight on a priority-setting system for North American birds by using Bird
Conservation Regions (ecological regions defined by climate, physiography, vegetation and
bird communities) as our spatial framework.